
This is an interesting article that has been making its way around the porn-related part of the interwebs today from the New York Times… It’s a little on the academic side, but it gets to address the idea that some people get really freaked out and upset when there’s “pornographic” sex in movies, especially when it’s not the most authentic representation of sex. I’m not talking a nude scene here, but actual sex scenes.
The author of the piece (Mireille Miller-Young) suggests that there’s something pretty wrong about how flagrantly up in arms people get about sex in films (and all pop culture, really) when it’s actually explicit or accurate, given how poor most places are about educating their public about sex, but also that it’s understandable when it comes to people who feel like the depiction is just for titillation, and not actually sincere. If anything, more inclusion of sex would benefit those watching the movies, who might be inspired to learn a bit more about themselves or their partners, but only if it’s realistic…
She continues to suggest that, in fact, sex in porn itself has a lot more to offer an audience than a Hollywood film, so maybe we shouldn’t be so concerned with labels like “pornographic” and be more concerned about showing what sex could be. What do you think? Do you think porn can be a good tool for visibility of different ways of having sex? Do you think that mainstream films could ever catch up to sharing authentic sex?




